Rizon 10 vs MiniCobo
Side-by-side comparison of Rizon 10 (Flexiv Ltd.) and MiniCobo (Jaka) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Rizon 10China
- MiniCoboChina
Year First Available
- Rizon 102016
- MiniCobo2014
Verified Deployments
- Rizon 100 Deployments
- MiniCobo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Rizon 10$65,000 USD
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD
Availability Status
- Rizon 10ACTIVE
- MiniCoboACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Rizon 1010 kg
- MiniCobo1 kg
Robot Weight
- Rizon 1033 kg
- MiniCobo9.4 kg
Max TCP Speed
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCobo1.5 m/s
Reach
- Rizon 101,015 mm
- MiniCobo580 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Rizon 107
- MiniCobo6
Repeatability
- Rizon 10±0.1 mm
- MiniCobo±0.1 mm
Mounting Options
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCobofloor, ceiling, wall
IP Rating
- Rizon 10IP65
- MiniCoboIP54
Safety
Safety Rating
- Rizon 10CE, ISO/TS 15066
- MiniCoboISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- Rizon 10Yes
- MiniCobonone
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCoboYes
Offline Programming
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCoboNo
Programming Interface
- Rizon 10drag_and_drop, code_python
- MiniCoboGraphic Programming
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCoboISO 9409-1-A50
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCoboEtherCAT, Profinet
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Rizon 10$65,000 USD
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD
Warranty
- Rizon 10—
- MiniCobo2 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $65,000 USD | $13,313 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 10 kg | 1 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 33 kg | 9.4 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,015 mm | 580 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | 6 |
| Repeatability | ±0.1 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor, ceiling, wall |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP65 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, ISO/TS 15066 | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | drag_and_drop, code_python | Graphic Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1-A50 |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | EtherCAT, Profinet |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $65,000 USD | $13,313 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Rizon 10 | MiniCobo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $65,000 | $13,313 |
| Payback period | 15.6 mo | 3.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $185,000 | $236,688 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +285% | +1778% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Rizon 10 and MiniCobo?
Rizon 10 is made by Flexiv Ltd., based in CN. MiniCobo is made by Jaka, based in CN.
When were Rizon 10 and MiniCobo launched?
Rizon 10 launched in 2016. MiniCobo launched in 2014.
How do Rizon 10 and MiniCobo compare on the Robo Index?
Rizon 10 grades A on the Robo Index. MiniCobo grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Rizon 10 compare to MiniCobo?
Rizon 10 has a reach of 1015 mm. MiniCobo has a reach of 580 mm.
Are Rizon 10 and MiniCobo in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Rizon 10 and MiniCobo?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Rizon 10 vs MiniCobo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.