HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) vs Mako Total Knee

Side-by-side comparison of HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) (Cyberdyne) and Mako Total Knee (Stryker) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in

View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

Default Hospitality & F&B Warehousing & Logistics Manufacturing Healthcare & Hospitals Cleaning & Facilities Last-Mile Delivery Agriculture Home & Household

Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04)63.2

Mako Total Knee60.0

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04)Japan
Mako Total KneeUnited States

Verified Deployments

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04)0 Deployments
Mako Total Knee0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Availability Status

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04)ACTIVE
Mako Total KneeACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

	HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04)surgical-medicalCyberdyne 63.2Robo Score	Mako Total Kneesurgical-medicalStryker 60.0Robo Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)	Japan	United States
Verified Deployments	0 Deployments	0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status	ACTIVE	ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Robots (fleet)

Hours / day

Labor $/hr (USD)

Days / year

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metric	HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04)	Mako Total Knee
Investment	No price	No price
Payback period	—	—
Net savings (5 yr)	—	—
ROI (5 yr)	—	—

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04), Mako Total Knee have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) and Mako Total Knee?

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. Mako Total Knee is made by Stryker, based in US.

How do HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) and Mako Total Knee compare on the Robo Score?

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) scores 63.2 on the Robo Score. Mako Total Knee scores 60.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) and Mako Total Knee in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) and Mako Total Knee?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Other comparisons

About this comparison

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (BB04) vs Mako Total Knee compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.