Skip to content

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) vs Hugo RAS system

Side-by-side comparison of HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) (Cyberdyne) and Hugo RAS system (Medtronic plc — Surgical Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
    HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)Japan
  • Hugo RAS system
    Hugo RAS systemIreland

Year First Available

  • HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
    HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
  • Hugo RAS system
    Hugo RAS system2019

Verified Deployments

  • HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
    HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)0 Deployments
  • Hugo RAS system
    Hugo RAS system0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

  • HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
    HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)Contact for quote
  • Hugo RAS system
    Hugo RAS system$1,500,000 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime

  • HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
    HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)4.5 hrs
  • Hugo RAS system
    Hugo RAS system

Availability Status

  • HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)
    HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)ACTIVE
  • Hugo RAS system
    Hugo RAS systemACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

MetricHAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02)Hugo RAS system
InvestmentNo price$1,500,000
Payback period360.0 mo
Net savings (5 yr)-$1,250,000
ROI (5 yr)-83%

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) and Hugo RAS system?

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. Hugo RAS system is made by Medtronic plc — Surgical Robotics, based in IE.

How do HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) and Hugo RAS system compare on the Robo Index?

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) grades AA on the Robo Index. Hugo RAS system grades BB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) and Hugo RAS system in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) and Hugo RAS system?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) vs Hugo RAS system compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.