HRP-4 vs Mindar
Side-by-side comparison of HRP-4 (Kawada Industries) and Mindar (Kokoro) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- HRP-4Japan
- Mindar—
Year First Available
- HRP-42010
- Mindar2019
Verified Deployments
- HRP-40 Deployments
- Mindar0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- HRP-4$300,000–$305,000 USD
- Mindar$909,090 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HRP-40.4 hrs
- Mindar48 hrs
Availability Status
- HRP-4ACTIVE
- MindarACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- HRP-4151 mm
- Mindar195 mm
Weight
- HRP-439 kg
- Mindar57 kg
Mobility Type
- HRP-4bipedal
- Mindarstatic
Humanoid Subtype
- HRP-4research platform
- Mindarfull bipedal
Walking Speed
- HRP-40.6 m/s
- Mindar—
Stair Climbing
- HRP-4No
- MindarNo
Terrain
- HRP-4flat indoor
- Mindarindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- HRP-40.5 kg
- Mindar100 kg
Total DOF
- HRP-434
- Mindar—
Arm DOF
- HRP-47
- Mindar—
Hand DOF
- HRP-42
- Mindar—
Bimanual Coordination
- HRP-4Yes
- MindarNo
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- HRP-4Linux kernel with RT-Preempt patch
- MindarIntel® Core™ Ultra X9 388H processor
Compute Platform
- HRP-4Intel Pentium M (1.6 GHz)
- Mindar—
VLM Capable
- HRP-4No
- MindarNo
Foundation Models
- HRP-4false
- Mindarfalse
Imitation Learning
- HRP-4No
- MindarNo
Programming
- HRP-4code_ros
- Mindar—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- HRP-40.4 hrs
- Mindar48 hrs
Battery Swap
- HRP-4No
- MindarNo
Safety
Human Detection Method
- HRP-4vision human
- Mindar—
Software
SDK Languages
- HRP-4Linux
- Mindar—
ROS Support
- HRP-4Yes
- MindarNo
Open API
- HRP-4No
- MindarNo
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- HRP-4prototype
- Mindarcommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- HRP-4$300,000–$305,000 USD
- Mindar$909,090 USD
Price Tier
- HRP-4150K+
- Mindar150K+
Pricing Model
- HRP-4purchase
- Mindaroutright purchase
Applications
- HRP-4research
- Mindarreligious service, cultural education
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2010 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $300,000–$305,000 USD | $909,090 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 0.4 hrs | 48 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 151 mm | 195 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 39 kg | 57 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | research platform | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.6 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing | No | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 100 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Linux kernel with RT-Preempt patch | Intel® Core™ Ultra X9 388H processor |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Intel Pentium M (1.6 GHz) | — |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models | false | false |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 0.4 hrs | 48 hrs |
| Battery Swap | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Linux | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Open API | No | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $300,000–$305,000 USD | $909,090 USD |
| Price Tier | 150K+ | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | outright purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | research | religious service, cultural education |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HRP-4 | Mindar |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $302,500 | $909,090 |
| Payback period | 72.6 mo | 218.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | -$52,500 | -$659,090 |
| ROI (5 yr) | -17% | -72% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes HRP-4 and Mindar?
HRP-4 is made by Kawada Industries, based in JP. Mindar is made by Kokoro.
When were HRP-4 and Mindar launched?
HRP-4 launched in 2010. Mindar launched in 2019.
How do HRP-4 and Mindar compare on the Robo Index?
HRP-4 grades AA on the Robo Index. Mindar grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between HRP-4 and Mindar?
HRP-4 carries up to 0.5 kg. Mindar carries up to 100 kg.
Are HRP-4 and Mindar in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HRP-4 and Mindar?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
HRP-4 vs Mindar compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.