Humanoid Robots vs Tien Kung
Side-by-side comparison of Humanoid Robots (Agile Plant Solutions) and Tien Kung (X-Humanoid) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Humanoid RobotshumanoidAgile Plant Solutions55.8Trust Score |  Tien KunghumanoidX-Humanoid43.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $41,200 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 69 kg | 73 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 174 mm | 1700 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 3.3 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 40 | 20 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 21 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 21 | 6 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | AgileCore (proprietary) | Nvidia Jetson Orin |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | hybrid | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | Robotic Foundation Models | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset, joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | voice, app control |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | voice, app control |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | Yes |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $41,200 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Applications (values differ) | material handling, assembly, machine tending, precision assembly | research, hazardous_env, industrial automation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Humanoid Robots vs Tien Kung compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.