iFM T1 - 接驳线 vs MiniCobo
Side-by-side comparison of iFM T1 - 接驳线 (DH Robotics) and MiniCobo (Jaka) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- iFM T1 - 接驳线China
- MiniCoboChina
Year First Available
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCobo2014
Verified Deployments
- iFM T1 - 接驳线0 Deployments
- MiniCobo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- iFM T1 - 接驳线Contact for quote
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD
Availability Status
- iFM T1 - 接驳线ACTIVE
- MiniCoboACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- iFM T1 - 接驳线15 kg
- MiniCobo1 kg
Max TCP Speed
- iFM T1 - 接驳线4 m/s
- MiniCobo1.5 m/s
IP Rating
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCoboIP54
Reach
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCobo580 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCobo6
Repeatability
- iFM T1 - 接驳线±10 mm
- MiniCobo±0.1 mm
Robot Weight
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCobo9.4 kg
Mounting Options
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCobofloor, ceiling, wall
Safety
Safety Rating
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCoboISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- iFM T1 - 接驳线none
- MiniCobonone
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCoboYes
Offline Programming
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCoboNo
Programming Interface
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCoboGraphic Programming
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCoboISO 9409-1-A50
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- iFM T1 - 接驳线EtherCAT, TCP Modbus / TCP
- MiniCoboEtherCAT, Profinet
Commercial
Price (USD)
- iFM T1 - 接驳线Contact for quote
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD
Warranty
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
- MiniCobo2 yrs
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $13,313 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 15 kg | 1 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 4 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 580 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±10 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 9.4 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor, ceiling, wall |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | Graphic Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1-A50 |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, TCP Modbus / TCP | EtherCAT, Profinet |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $13,313 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | iFM T1 - 接驳线 | MiniCobo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $13,313 |
| Payback period | — | 3.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $236,688 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +1778% |
iFM T1 - 接驳线 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes iFM T1 - 接驳线 and MiniCobo?
iFM T1 - 接驳线 is made by DH Robotics, based in CN. MiniCobo is made by Jaka, based in CN.
How do iFM T1 - 接驳线 and MiniCobo compare on the Robo Index?
iFM T1 - 接驳线 grades BB on the Robo Index. MiniCobo grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are iFM T1 - 接驳线 and MiniCobo in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between iFM T1 - 接驳线 and MiniCobo?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
iFM T1 - 接驳线 vs MiniCobo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.