MiniCobo vs Rizon 4s
Side-by-side comparison of MiniCobo (Jaka) and Rizon 4s (Flexiv Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiniCoboChina

- Rizon 4sChina

Year First Available
- MiniCobo2014

- Rizon 4s—

Verified Deployments
- MiniCobo0 Deployments

- Rizon 4s0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD

- Rizon 4s$35,000–$65,000 USD

Availability Status
- MiniCoboACTIVE

- Rizon 4sACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Reach
- MiniCobo580 mm

- Rizon 4s919 mm

Repeatability
- MiniCobo±0.1 mm

- Rizon 4s±0.05 mm

Payload
- MiniCobo1 kg

- Rizon 4s4 kg

IP Rating
- MiniCoboIP54

- Rizon 4s—

Degrees of Freedom
- MiniCobo6

- Rizon 4s7

Max TCP Speed
- MiniCobo1.5 m/s

- Rizon 4s—

Robot Weight
- MiniCobo9.4 kg

- Rizon 4s21 kg

Mounting Options
- MiniCobofloor, ceiling, wall

- Rizon 4sany angle, AMR, AGV

Safety
Safety Rating
- MiniCoboISO/TS 15066

- Rizon 4sCE, ETL

Force/Torque Sensing
- MiniCobonone

- Rizon 4snone

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- MiniCoboYes

- Rizon 4s—

Offline Programming
- MiniCoboNo

- Rizon 4s—

Programming Interface
- MiniCoboGraphic Programming

- Rizon 4sdrag_and_drop, proprietary_app

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MiniCoboISO 9409-1-A50

- Rizon 4s—

Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- MiniCoboEtherCAT, Profinet

- Rizon 4s—

Commercial
Price (USD)
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD

- Rizon 4s$35,000–$65,000 USD

Warranty
- MiniCobo2 yrs

- Rizon 4s—

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $13,313 USD | $35,000–$65,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 580 mm | 919 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1 kg | 4 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 7 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 9.4 kg | 21 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | any angle, AMR, AGV |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | CE, ETL |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | Graphic Programming | drag_and_drop, proprietary_app |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Profinet | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,313 USD | $35,000–$65,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiniCobo | Rizon 4s |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $13,313 | $50,000 |
| Payback period | 3.2 mo | 12.0 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $236,688 | $200,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1778% | +400% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiniCobo and Rizon 4s?
MiniCobo is made by Jaka, based in CN. Rizon 4s is made by Flexiv Ltd., based in CN.
How do MiniCobo and Rizon 4s compare on the Robo Index?
MiniCobo grades AA on the Robo Index. Rizon 4s grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of MiniCobo compare to Rizon 4s?
MiniCobo has a reach of 580 mm. Rizon 4s has a reach of 919 mm.
Are MiniCobo and Rizon 4s in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiniCobo and Rizon 4s?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiniCobo vs Rizon 4s compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.