MiniCobo vs UR10e
Side-by-side comparison of MiniCobo (Jaka) and UR10e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiniCoboChina

- UR10eDenmark

Year First Available
- MiniCobo2014

- UR10e2008

Verified Deployments
- MiniCobo0 Deployments

- UR10e0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD

- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD

Availability Status
- MiniCoboACTIVE

- UR10eACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- MiniCobo9.4 kg

- UR10e33.5 kg

Max TCP Speed
- MiniCobo1.5 m/s

- UR10e1 m/s

Payload
- MiniCobo1 kg

- UR10e10 kg

Reach
- MiniCobo580 mm

- UR10e1,300 mm

Degrees of Freedom
- MiniCobo6

- UR10e6

Repeatability
- MiniCobo±0.1 mm

- UR10e±0.05 mm

Mounting Options
- MiniCobofloor, ceiling, wall

- UR10efloor, ceiling, wall, rail

IP Rating
- MiniCoboIP54

- UR10eIP54

Safety
Safety Rating
- MiniCoboISO/TS 15066

- UR10eCat3 PLd

Force/Torque Sensing
- MiniCobonone

- UR10ewrist external

Duty Cycle
- MiniCobo—

- UR10e24 7 continuous

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- MiniCoboYes

- UR10eYes

Offline Programming
- MiniCoboNo

- UR10eYes

Programming Interface
- MiniCoboGraphic Programming

- UR10eteach_pendant, no_code_gui

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MiniCoboISO 9409-1-A50

- UR10eiso 9283

Tool Changer Support
- MiniCobo—

- UR10eautomatic

Integrated F/T Sensor
- MiniCobo—

- UR10eYes

Wrist Power Supply
- MiniCobo—

- UR10e24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic

Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- MiniCobo—

- UR10ePython, C++, URScript, .NET

Fieldbus Protocols
- MiniCoboEtherCAT, Profinet

- UR10eMODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet

Digital Twin Support
- MiniCobo—

- UR10eYes

Commercial
Price (USD)
- MiniCobo$13,313 USD

- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD

Warranty
- MiniCobo2 yrs

- UR10e—

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $13,313 USD | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 9.4 kg | 33.5 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1 kg | 10 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 580 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | floor, ceiling, wall, rail |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | wrist external |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | Graphic Programming | teach_pendant, no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | automatic |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, URScript, .NET |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Profinet | MODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,313 USD | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, ROS Compatible, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiniCobo | UR10e |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $13,313 | $46,153 |
| Payback period | 3.2 mo | 11.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $236,688 | $203,847 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1778% | +442% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiniCobo and UR10e?
MiniCobo is made by Jaka, based in CN. UR10e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
When were MiniCobo and UR10e launched?
MiniCobo launched in 2014. UR10e launched in 2008.
How do MiniCobo and UR10e compare on the Robo Index?
MiniCobo grades AA on the Robo Index. UR10e grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of MiniCobo compare to UR10e?
MiniCobo has a reach of 580 mm. UR10e has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are MiniCobo and UR10e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiniCobo and UR10e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiniCobo vs UR10e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.