Kangaroo Pro vs Qinglong
Side-by-side comparison of Kangaroo Pro (PAL Robotics) and Qinglong (Shanghai Innovation Center) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Kangaroo ProSpain
- Qinglong—
Year First Available
- Kangaroo Pro2025
- Qinglong2024
Verified Deployments
- Kangaroo Pro0 Deployments
- Qinglong0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Kangaroo Pro$100,000 USD
- QinglongContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Kangaroo Pro6 hrs
- Qinglong—
Availability Status
- Kangaroo ProACTIVE
- QinglongACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- Kangaroo Pro40 kg
- Qinglong30 kg
Height
- Kangaroo Pro1450 mm
- Qinglong180 mm
Mobility Type
- Kangaroo Probipedal
- Qinglongbipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Kangaroo Profull bipedal
- Qinglongfull bipedal
Stair Climbing
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglong—
Terrain
- Kangaroo Proflat indoor
- Qinglongboth
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- Kangaroo Pro—
- Qinglong43
Bimanual Coordination
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglongnone
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Kangaroo ProNVidia Jetson
- Qinglong400 TOPS
VLM Capable
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglong—
Foundation Models
- Kangaroo Profalse
- Qinglong—
Imitation Learning
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglong—
Programming
- Kangaroo Procustom control interface
- Qinglongcode_python, code_ros
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Kangaroo Pro6 hrs
- Qinglong1 hrs
Battery Swap
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglong—
Software
SDK Languages
- Kangaroo ProPython
- Qinglongcode_python, code_ros
ROS Support
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglong—
Open API
- Kangaroo ProNo
- Qinglongclosed
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Kangaroo Procommercial
- Qinglongprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Kangaroo Pro$100,000 USD
- QinglongContact for quote
Applications
- Kangaroo Proresearch, education
- Qinglongresearch
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Spain | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $100,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 6 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 40 kg | 30 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1450 mm | 180 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 43 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | none |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVidia Jetson | 400 TOPS |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | custom control interface | code_python, code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | code_python, code_ros |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | — |
| Open API (values differ) | No | closed |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Applications (values differ) | research, education | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Walking Speed, Running Capable, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Kangaroo Pro | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $100,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 24.0 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $150,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +150% | — |
Qinglong has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Kangaroo Pro and Qinglong?
Kangaroo Pro is made by PAL Robotics, based in ES. Qinglong is made by Shanghai Innovation Center.
When were Kangaroo Pro and Qinglong launched?
Kangaroo Pro launched in 2025. Qinglong launched in 2024.
How do Kangaroo Pro and Qinglong compare on the Robo Index?
Kangaroo Pro grades AA on the Robo Index. Qinglong grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Kangaroo Pro and Qinglong in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Kangaroo Pro and Qinglong?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Kangaroo Pro vs Qinglong compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.