Side-by-side comparison of Kirobo Mini (Toyota) and Olivia (A*STAR Social Robotics Lab) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Charging Time


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Singapore |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $474 USD | $198 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 10 cm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 0.2 kg | 152 kg |
| Mobility Type | static | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 0.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | static walk |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 132 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | independent |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | none |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Intel Core i7 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel Core i7 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | single task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | dedicated app | proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 16 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 4.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | auto dock |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | none |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | none |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Japanese | Java, Kotlin |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | none |
| Open API (values differ) | No | closed |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $474 USD | $198 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | under_50k | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | outright purchase | capex |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Kirobo Mini | Olivia |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $474 | $198 |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | < 1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $249,526 | $249,802 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +52643% | +126163% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
Kirobo Mini is made by Toyota, based in JP. Olivia is made by A*STAR Social Robotics Lab, based in SG.
Kirobo Mini launched in 2016. Olivia launched in 2009.
Kirobo Mini is listed at $474. Olivia is listed at $198.
Kirobo Mini grades AA on the Robo Index. Olivia grades BB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Kirobo Mini vs Olivia compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.