Mako Spine vs RP-VITA

Side-by-side comparison of Mako Spine (Stryker) and RP-VITA (InTouch Health and iRobot) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in

View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

Default Hospitality & F&B Warehousing & Logistics Manufacturing Healthcare & Hospitals Cleaning & Facilities Last-Mile Delivery Agriculture Home & Household

Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Mako SpineA

RP-VITAAA

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

Mako SpineUnited States
RP-VITAUnited States

Year First Available

Mako Spine—
RP-VITA2012

Verified Deployments

Mako Spine0 Deployments
RP-VITA0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Availability Status

Mako SpineACTIVE
RP-VITAACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Max Speed

Mako Spine—
RP-VITA1.5 m/s

Autonomy Level

Mako Spine—
RP-VITAsemi-autonomous

	Mako Spinesurgical-medicalStryker ARobo Index	RP-VITAsurgical-medicalInTouch Health and iRobot AARobo Index
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country	United States	United States
Year First Available (values differ)	—	2012
Verified Deployments	0 Deployments	0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status	ACTIVE	ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Max Speed (values differ)	—	1.5 m/s
Autonomy Level (values differ)	—	semi-autonomous

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Robots (fleet)

Hours / day

Labor $/hr (USD)

Days / year

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metric	Mako Spine	RP-VITA
Investment	No price	No price
Payback period	—	—
Net savings (5 yr)	—	—
ROI (5 yr)	—	—

Mako Spine, RP-VITA have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes Mako Spine and RP-VITA?

Mako Spine is made by Stryker, based in US. RP-VITA is made by InTouch Health and iRobot, based in US.

How do Mako Spine and RP-VITA compare on the Robo Index?

Mako Spine grades A on the Robo Index. RP-VITA grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are Mako Spine and RP-VITA in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mako Spine and RP-VITA?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Other comparisons

About this comparison

Mako Spine vs RP-VITA compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.