Skip to content
Claim

Mako Total Hip vs RP-VITA

Side-by-side comparison of Mako Total Hip (Stryker) and RP-VITA (InTouch Health and iRobot) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

DefaultHospitality & F&BWarehousing & LogisticsManufacturingHealthcare & HospitalsCleaning & FacilitiesLast-Mile DeliveryAgricultureHome & Household

Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Mako Total Hip
Mako Total HipA
RP-VITAAA

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total HipUnited States
  • RP-VITAUnited States

Year First Available

  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total Hip—
  • RP-VITA2012

Verified Deployments

  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total Hip0 Deployments
  • RP-VITA0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Availability Status

  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total HipACTIVE
  • RP-VITAACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Max Speed

  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total Hip—
  • RP-VITA1.5 m/s

Autonomy Level

  • Mako Total Hip
    Mako Total Hip—
  • RP-VITAsemi-autonomous

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

MetricMako Total HipRP-VITA
InvestmentNo priceNo price
Payback period——
Net savings (5 yr)——
ROI (5 yr)——

Mako Total Hip, RP-VITA have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes Mako Total Hip and RP-VITA?

Mako Total Hip is made by Stryker, based in US. RP-VITA is made by InTouch Health and iRobot, based in US.

How do Mako Total Hip and RP-VITA compare on the Robo Index?

Mako Total Hip grades A on the Robo Index. RP-VITA grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are Mako Total Hip and RP-VITA in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mako Total Hip and RP-VITA?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

Mako Total Hip vs RP-VITA compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.