MOTOMAN HC30PL vs SR8-2600
Side-by-side comparison of MOTOMAN HC30PL (Motoman) and SR8-2600 (Jiangsu Novotech Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MOTOMAN HC30PLJapan
- SR8-2600—
Year First Available
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2019
- SR8-2600—
Verified Deployments
- MOTOMAN HC30PL0 Deployments
- SR8-26000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- SR8-2600$12,000 USD
Availability Status
- MOTOMAN HC30PLACTIVE
- SR8-2600ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
- MOTOMAN HC30PL±0.03 mm
- SR8-2600±0.1 mm
IP Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLIP54
- SR8-2600IP65
Reach
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1,300 mm
- SR8-26002,600 mm
Payload
- MOTOMAN HC30PL5 kg
- SR8-26008 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- MOTOMAN HC30PL6
- SR8-26006
Max TCP Speed
- MOTOMAN HC30PL3.1 m/s
- SR8-26003 m/s
Robot Weight
- MOTOMAN HC30PL140 kg
- SR8-2600350 kg
Mounting Options
- MOTOMAN HC30PLfloor, ceiling, wall
- SR8-2600floor, ceiling, wall, inverted
Safety
Safety Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO/TS 15066
- SR8-2600ISO quality management system certification, CE certification, ATEX
Force/Torque Sensing
- MOTOMAN HC30PLnone
- SR8-2600none
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1 hrs
- SR8-2600—
No-Code Capable
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- SR8-2600—
Offline Programming
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- SR8-2600—
Programming Interface
- MOTOMAN HC30PLAUBO SDK
- SR8-2600teach_pendant
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO 9409-1-A50
- SR8-2600—
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- MOTOMAN HC30PLNo
- SR8-2600—
Fieldbus Protocols
- MOTOMAN HC30PLEtherCAT
- SR8-2600—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- SR8-2600$12,000 USD
Warranty
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2 yrs
- SR8-26001 yrs
Lead Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL4 wks
- SR8-26006 wks
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | $12,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | IP65 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 1,300 mm | 2,600 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 8 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 3.1 m/s | 3 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | 350 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | floor, ceiling, wall, inverted |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | ISO quality management system certification, CE certification, ATEX |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | AUBO SDK | teach_pendant |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | $12,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 1 yrs |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | 6 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MOTOMAN HC30PL | SR8-2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $60,000 | $12,000 |
| Payback period | 14.4 mo | 2.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $190,000 | $238,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +317% | +1983% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MOTOMAN HC30PL and SR8-2600?
MOTOMAN HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP. SR8-2600 is made by Jiangsu Novotech Electronic Technology Co., Ltd..
How do MOTOMAN HC30PL and SR8-2600 compare on the Robo Score?
MOTOMAN HC30PL scores 74.7 on the Robo Score. SR8-2600 scores 60.8. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of MOTOMAN HC30PL compare to SR8-2600?
MOTOMAN HC30PL has a reach of 1700 mm. SR8-2600 has a reach of 850 mm.
Are MOTOMAN HC30PL and SR8-2600 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MOTOMAN HC30PL and SR8-2600?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MOTOMAN HC30PL vs SR8-2600 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.