MOTOMAN HC30PL vs TM30S
Side-by-side comparison of MOTOMAN HC30PL (Motoman) and TM30S (Techman Robot Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MOTOMAN HC30PLJapan
- TM30STaiwan
Year First Available
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2019
- TM30S2024
Verified Deployments
- MOTOMAN HC30PL0 Deployments
- TM30S0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- TM30SContact for quote
Availability Status
- MOTOMAN HC30PLACTIVE
- TM30SACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
- MOTOMAN HC30PL±0.03 mm
- TM30S±0.03 mm
IP Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLIP54
- TM30SIP65
Reach
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1,300 mm
- TM30S1,702 mm
Payload
- MOTOMAN HC30PL5 kg
- TM30S30 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- MOTOMAN HC30PL6
- TM30S6
Max TCP Speed
- MOTOMAN HC30PL3.1 m/s
- TM30S450 m/s
Robot Weight
- MOTOMAN HC30PL140 kg
- TM30S80.6 kg
Mounting Options
- MOTOMAN HC30PLfloor, ceiling, wall
- TM30S—
Safety
Safety Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO/TS 15066
- TM30STÜV certificated ISO 13849-1, ISO 10218-1, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- MOTOMAN HC30PLnone
- TM30Snone
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1 hrs
- TM30S—
No-Code Capable
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- TM30SYes
Offline Programming
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- TM30SNo
Programming Interface
- MOTOMAN HC30PLAUBO SDK
- TM30STMflow (flowchart based), TMscript (script based), TMcraft (developer based)
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO 9409-1-A50
- TM30S—
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- MOTOMAN HC30PLNo
- TM30S—
Fieldbus Protocols
- MOTOMAN HC30PLEtherCAT
- TM30SProfinet, EtherNet/IP, EtherCAT, CC-Link
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- TM30SContact for quote
Warranty
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2 yrs
- TM30S—
Lead Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL4 wks
- TM30S—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Taiwan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | IP65 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 1,300 mm | 1,702 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 30 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 3.1 m/s | 450 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | 80.6 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | TÜV certificated ISO 13849-1, ISO 10218-1, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | AUBO SDK | TMflow (flowchart based), TMscript (script based), TMcraft (developer based) |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT | Profinet, EtherNet/IP, EtherCAT, CC-Link |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MOTOMAN HC30PL | TM30S |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $60,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 14.4 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $190,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +317% | — |
TM30S has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MOTOMAN HC30PL and TM30S?
MOTOMAN HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP. TM30S is made by Techman Robot Inc., based in TW.
When were MOTOMAN HC30PL and TM30S launched?
MOTOMAN HC30PL launched in 2019. TM30S launched in 2024.
How do MOTOMAN HC30PL and TM30S compare on the Robo Score?
MOTOMAN HC30PL scores 74.7 on the Robo Score. TM30S scores 62.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of MOTOMAN HC30PL compare to TM30S?
MOTOMAN HC30PL has a reach of 1700 mm. TM30S has a reach of 1702 mm.
Are MOTOMAN HC30PL and TM30S in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MOTOMAN HC30PL and TM30S?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MOTOMAN HC30PL vs TM30S compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.