myCobot 280 vs YuMi
Side-by-side comparison of myCobot 280 (Elephant Robotics) and YuMi (ABB) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- myCobot 280China

- YuMiSwitzerland

Year First Available
- myCobot 2802020

- YuMi2011

Verified Deployments
- myCobot 2800 Deployments

- YuMi0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- myCobot 280$639–$849 USD

- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD

Availability Status
- myCobot 280ACTIVE

- YuMiACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Payload
- myCobot 2800.3 kg

- YuMi0.5 kg

Max TCP Speed
- myCobot 280—

- YuMi1.5 m/s

Reach
- myCobot 280280 mm

- YuMi560 mm

Degrees of Freedom
- myCobot 2806

- YuMi14

Repeatability
- myCobot 280±0.5 mm

- YuMi±0.02 mm

Robot Weight
- myCobot 2800.9 kg

- YuMi38 kg

Mounting Options
- myCobot 280—

- YuMifloor

IP Rating
- myCobot 280—

- YuMiIP30

Safety
Safety Rating
- myCobot 280—

- YuMiCat2 PLc

Force/Torque Sensing
- myCobot 280none

- YuMinone

TCP Speed (Collaborative)
- myCobot 280—

- YuMi1.5 m/s

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- myCobot 280Yes

- YuMiYes

Offline Programming
- myCobot 280Yes

- YuMiNo

Programming Interface
- myCobot 280code_python, code_ros

- YuMiLead-Through Programming

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- myCobot 280—

- YuMiiso 9283 compatible

Integrated F/T Sensor
- myCobot 280—

- YuMiYes

Wrist Power Supply
- myCobot 280—

- YuMi24V; 1A

Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- myCobot 280Python, JavaScript, C++, C#

- YuMi—

ROS Compatible
- myCobot 280Yes

- YuMi—

Fieldbus Protocols
- myCobot 280TCP/IP, MODBUS

- YuMiEthernet, Fieldbus

Digital Twin Support
- myCobot 280—

- YuMiYes

Reliability
MTBF
- myCobot 280500 hrs

- YuMi—

Commercial
Price (USD)
- myCobot 280$639–$849 USD

- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD

CaaS / Month
- myCobot 280—

- YuMi$1,000

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Switzerland |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2020 | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $639–$849 USD | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 0.3 kg | 0.5 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 280 mm | 560 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 14 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 0.9 kg | 38 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP30 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | Cat2 PLc |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| TCP Speed (Collaborative) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | Lead-Through Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 compatible |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V; 1A |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, JavaScript, C++, C# | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | TCP/IP, MODBUS | Ethernet, Fieldbus |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| MTBF (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 500 hrs | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $639–$849 USD | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $1,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Path Accuracy, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | myCobot 280 | YuMi |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $744 | $45,500 |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | 10.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $249,256 | $204,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +33505% | +449% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes myCobot 280 and YuMi?
myCobot 280 is made by Elephant Robotics, based in CN. YuMi is made by ABB, based in CH.
When were myCobot 280 and YuMi launched?
myCobot 280 launched in 2020. YuMi launched in 2011.
How do myCobot 280 and YuMi compare on the Robo Score?
myCobot 280 scores 64.7 on the Robo Score. YuMi scores 75.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of myCobot 280 compare to YuMi?
myCobot 280 has a reach of 280 mm. YuMi has a reach of 559 mm.
Are myCobot 280 and YuMi in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between myCobot 280 and YuMi?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
myCobot 280 vs YuMi compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.