Paloma vs RM75
Side-by-side comparison of Paloma (Demaurex) and RM75 (RealMan Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Paloma—
- RM75China
Year First Available
- Paloma2014
- RM75—
Verified Deployments
- Paloma0 Deployments
- RM750 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Paloma$15,200 USD
- RM75$15,146–$27,776 USD
Availability Status
- PalomaACTIVE
- RM75ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- Paloma—
- RM75638.5 mm
Repeatability
- Paloma—
- RM75±0.05 mm
Payload
- Paloma3 kg
- RM755 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- PalomaIP54
- RM75IP54
Robot Weight
- Paloma8.5 kg
- RM757.9 kg
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- PalomaGemini 4.0
- RM75integrated
Teach Pendant Type
- Paloma—
- RM75teach pendant
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Paloma$15,200 USD
- RM75$15,146–$27,776 USD
Service Network
- Palomaregional
- RM75—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $15,200 USD | $15,146–$27,776 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | 638.5 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | ±0.05 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 3 kg | 5 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 8.5 kg | 7.9 kg |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Gemini 4.0 | integrated |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | teach pendant |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $15,200 USD | $15,146–$27,776 USD |
| Service Network (values differ) | regional | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Paloma | RM75 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $15,200 | $21,461 |
| Payback period | 3.6 mo | 5.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $234,800 | $228,539 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1545% | +1065% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Paloma and RM75?
Paloma is made by Demaurex. RM75 is made by RealMan Robotics, based in CN.
How do Paloma and RM75 compare on the Robo Index?
Paloma grades AAA on the Robo Index. RM75 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Paloma and RM75 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Paloma and RM75?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Paloma vs RM75 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.