Side-by-side comparison of Q5 (Robotera) and Robbyant R1 (Ant Lingbo Technology) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Payload (Peak)

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Arm Reach

Grip Strength

Manipulation Repeatability

Bimanual Coordination

Tool Use

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Battery Capacity

Charging Time

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Avg Power Consumption

Force-Limited Arms

Fall Recovery

Fall Detection Response

Emergency Stops

Human Detection Method

Safe Speed Near Humans

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Simulation Platforms

Open API

Air-Gap Capable

IP Rating

Task Success Rate

Deployment Maturity

Noise Level

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Developer Unit Price

Delivery Lead Time

Warranty

Production Pilots

Applications

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available | 2025 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $55,833 USD | $55,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 165 mm | 170 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 70 kg | 110 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed | 1.5 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | production ready | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat indoor, uneven outdoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 10 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 44 | 34 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 11 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 80 cm | — |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 20 N | — |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | coordinated planning | No |
| Tool Use (values differ) | vendor demo | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 275 TOPS | MX6800 depth engine chip |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | No |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset, glove_based | — |
| Programming (values differ) | AI-powered voice system | Open-source |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.5 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | 300 W | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Detection Response (values differ) | 100 ms | — |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | ssm_equivalent | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | No |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest websocket | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 95 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Noise Level (values differ) | 60 dB | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $55,833 USD | $55,000 USD |
| Price Tier | 40-80K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | $79,900 | — |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | 3 mo | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | BMW Spartanburg, GXO Logistics | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, eldercare_assistance, education | hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Foundation Models, MTBF, RaaS / Month
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Q5 | Robbyant R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $55,833 | $55,000 |
| Payback period | 13.4 mo | 13.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $194,167 | $195,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +348% | +355% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
Q5 is made by Robotera, based in CN. Robbyant R1 is made by Ant Lingbo Technology, based in CN.
Q5 launched in 2025. Robbyant R1 launched in 2025.
Q5 is listed at $55,833. Robbyant R1 is listed at $55,000.
Q5 grades A on the Robo Index. Robbyant R1 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Q5 vs Robbyant R1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.