Racer-5-0.80 COBOT vs YuMi
Side-by-side comparison of Racer-5-0.80 COBOT (Comau) and YuMi (ABB) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTItaly
- YuMiSwitzerland
Year First Available
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMi2011
Verified Deployments
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT0 Deployments
- YuMi0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTContact for quote
- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD
Availability Status
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTACTIVE
- YuMiACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT34 kg
- YuMi38 kg
Max TCP Speed
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMi1.5 m/s
Payload
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT5 kg
- YuMi0.5 kg
Reach
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT809 mm
- YuMi560 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT6
- YuMi14
Repeatability
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT±0.03 mm
- YuMi±0.02 mm
Mounting Options
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTfloor, wall, ceiling
- YuMifloor
IP Rating
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTIP54
- YuMiIP30
Safety
Safety Rating
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTPL d CAT. 3
- YuMiCat2 PLc
Force/Torque Sensing
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTnone
- YuMinone
TCP Speed (Collaborative)
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMi1.5 m/s
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMiYes
Offline Programming
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMiNo
Programming Interface
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMiLead-Through Programming
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTISO 9409 – 1 – A 25
- YuMiiso 9283 compatible
Integrated F/T Sensor
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMiYes
Wrist Power Supply
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMi24V; 1A
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMiEthernet, Fieldbus
Digital Twin Support
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMiYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOTContact for quote
- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD
CaaS / Month
- Racer-5-0.80 COBOT—
- YuMi$1,000
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | Switzerland |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 34 kg | 38 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 0.5 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 809 mm | 560 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 14 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, wall, ceiling | floor |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | IP30 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | PL d CAT. 3 | Cat2 PLc |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| TCP Speed (Collaborative) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | Lead-Through Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409 – 1 – A 25 | iso 9283 compatible |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V; 1A |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | Ethernet, Fieldbus |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $1,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Racer-5-0.80 COBOT | YuMi |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $45,500 |
| Payback period | — | 10.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $204,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +449% |
Racer-5-0.80 COBOT has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Racer-5-0.80 COBOT and YuMi?
Racer-5-0.80 COBOT is made by Comau, based in IT. YuMi is made by ABB, based in CH.
How do Racer-5-0.80 COBOT and YuMi compare on the Robo Score?
Racer-5-0.80 COBOT scores 57.7 on the Robo Score. YuMi scores 75.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Racer-5-0.80 COBOT compare to YuMi?
Racer-5-0.80 COBOT has a reach of 809 mm. YuMi has a reach of 559 mm.
Are Racer-5-0.80 COBOT and YuMi in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Racer-5-0.80 COBOT and YuMi?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Racer-5-0.80 COBOT vs YuMi compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.