TUG vs XiaoAo
Side-by-side comparison of TUG (Aethon) and XiaoAo (Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Prices in
View savedOptimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- TUGUnited States
- XiaoAoChina
Year First Available
- TUG2022
- XiaoAo2024
Verified Deployments
- TUG0 Deployments
- XiaoAo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- TUG$107,500 USD
- XiaoAo$3,000–$11,888 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- TUG10 hrs
- XiaoAo8 hrs
Availability Status
- TUGACTIVE
- XiaoAoACTIVE
Physical
Payload
- TUG453 kg
- XiaoAo—
Compartment Type
- TUGenclosed locked
- XiaoAo—
Dimensions
- TUG1168.4x1168.4x1168.4
- XiaoAo—
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- TUGslam natural
- XiaoAolidar slam
Max Speed
- TUG0.8 m/s
- XiaoAo—
Power
Battery Runtime
- TUG10 hrs
- XiaoAo8 hrs
Auto Docking
- TUGYes
- XiaoAo—
Integration
Elevator API
- TUGYes
- XiaoAo—
PMS / POS Integration
- TUGYes
- XiaoAo—
Fleet Management
- TUGcentralized cloud
- XiaoAo—
Floor Compatibility
- TUGhard floor,irregular concrete
- XiaoAo—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- TUG$107,500 USD
- XiaoAo$3,000–$11,888 USD
Warranty
- TUG—
- XiaoAo1 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2022 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $107,500 USD | $3,000–$11,888 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 453 kg | — |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | enclosed locked | — |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 1168.4x1168.4x1168.4 | — |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Integration | ||
| Elevator API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| PMS / POS Integration (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fleet Management (values differ) | centralized cloud | — |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor,irregular concrete | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $107,500 USD | $3,000–$11,888 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Robot Weight, Tray Count, IP Rating, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Hot-Swap Battery, Display Size, Voice Interaction, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | TUG | XiaoAo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $107,500 | $7,444 |
| Payback period | 25.8 mo | 1.8 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $142,500 | $242,556 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +133% | +3258% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes TUG and XiaoAo?
TUG is made by Aethon, based in US. XiaoAo is made by Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
When were TUG and XiaoAo launched?
TUG launched in 2022. XiaoAo launched in 2024.
How do TUG and XiaoAo compare on the Robo Index?
TUG grades A on the Robo Index. XiaoAo grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are TUG and XiaoAo in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Hospitality Service robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between TUG and XiaoAo?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
TUG vs XiaoAo compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.