远征A3 vs K2 Bumblebee
Side-by-side comparison of 远征A3 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and K2 Bumblebee (Kepler Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- 远征A3China

- K2 BumblebeeChina
Year First Available
- 远征A32023

- K2 Bumblebee—
Verified Deployments
- 远征A30 Deployments

- K2 Bumblebee0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- 远征A3$16,800 USD

- K2 BumblebeeContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 远征A310 hrs

- K2 Bumblebee8 hrs
Availability Status
- 远征A3ACTIVE

- K2 BumblebeeACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- 远征A355 kg

- K2 Bumblebee75 kg
Height
- 远征A31750 mm

- K2 Bumblebee175 mm
Mobility Type
- 远征A3bipedal

- K2 Bumblebeebipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- 远征A3full bipedal

- K2 Bumblebeefull bipedal
Walking Speed
- 远征A31.9 m/s

- K2 Bumblebee—
Terrain
- 远征A3indoor

- K2 Bumblebeestructured environments
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- 远征A35 kg

- K2 Bumblebee15 kg
Total DOF
- 远征A349

- K2 Bumblebee52
Arm DOF
- 远征A312

- K2 Bumblebee11
Hand DOF
- 远征A312

- K2 Bumblebee11
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- 远征A3具身智脑EI-Brain框架

- K2 Bumblebee100 TOPS
Imitation Learning
- 远征A3—

- K2 BumblebeeYes
Programming
- 远征A3—

- K2 Bumblebeecloud-based cognitive model
Battery & Power
Runtime
- 远征A310 hrs

- K2 Bumblebee8 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- 远征A3—

- K2 Bumblebeecloud-based cognitive model
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- 远征A3commercial

- K2 Bumblebeeproduction pilot
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 远征A3$16,800 USD

- K2 BumblebeeContact for quote
Price Tier
- 远征A320-40K

- K2 Bumblebee—
Pricing Model
- 远征A3purchase

- K2 Bumblebeecapex
Applications
- 远征A3教育科研, 仓储物流, 交互服务

- K2 Bumblebeelogistics_handling, manufacturing_assembly, research_development
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $16,800 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 55 kg | 75 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1750 mm | 175 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | structured environments |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 15 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 49 | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 12 | 11 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 11 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 具身智脑EI-Brain框架 | 100 TOPS |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming (values differ) | — | cloud-based cognitive model |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | cloud-based cognitive model |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $16,800 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Applications (values differ) | 教育科研, 仓储物流, 交互服务 | logistics_handling, manufacturing_assembly, research_development |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | 远征A3 | K2 Bumblebee |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $16,800 | No price |
| Payback period | 4.0 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $233,200 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1388% | — |
K2 Bumblebee has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes 远征A3 and K2 Bumblebee?
远征A3 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. K2 Bumblebee is made by Kepler Robotics, based in CN.
How do 远征A3 and K2 Bumblebee compare on the Robo Index?
远征A3 grades AA on the Robo Index. K2 Bumblebee grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between 远征A3 and K2 Bumblebee?
远征A3 carries up to 5 kg. K2 Bumblebee carries up to 15 kg.
Are 远征A3 and K2 Bumblebee in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between 远征A3 and K2 Bumblebee?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
远征A3 vs K2 Bumblebee compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.