AGIBOT G2 vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT G2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and 天链人形机器人T1 (TLI Robot) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AGIBOT G2China
- 天链人形机器人T1China
Year First Available
- AGIBOT G22025
- 天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT G20 Deployments
- 天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGIBOT G24 hrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Availability Status
- AGIBOT G2ACTIVE
- 天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- AGIBOT G255 kg
- 天链人形机器人T143 kg
Height
- AGIBOT G2175 mm
- 天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT G2wheeled
- 天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT G2wheeled humanoid
- 天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
- AGIBOT G21.9 m/s
- 天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Running Capable
- AGIBOT G2static walk
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Stair Climbing
- AGIBOT G2none
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Terrain
- AGIBOT G2flat_indoor, rough_indoor
- 天链人形机器人T1defense, education
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT G25 kg
- 天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
- AGIBOT G2—
- 天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
- AGIBOT G226
- 天链人形机器人T171
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT G27
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Hand DOF
- AGIBOT G212
- 天链人形机器人T13
Bimanual Coordination
- AGIBOT G2full bimanual
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Tool Use
- AGIBOT G2production validated
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT G2500 TOPS
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Compute Platform
- AGIBOT G2NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000
- 天链人形机器人T1—
VLM Capable
- AGIBOT G2onboard large
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Foundation Models
- AGIBOT G2GO-1, WorkGPT, Genie
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Imitation Learning
- AGIBOT G2multi task
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Teleoperation
- AGIBOT G2joystick, web_interface
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Programming
- AGIBOT G2no_code_gui, code_python, teleoperation
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AGIBOT G24 hrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Charging Method
- AGIBOT G2auto dock
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Battery Swap
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Safety
Force-Limited Arms
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Fall Recovery
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Human Detection Method
- AGIBOT G2multi modal
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Safe Speed Near Humans
- AGIBOT G2software_defined
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT G2Python
- 天链人形机器人T1—
ROS Support
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Simulation Platforms
- AGIBOT G2Genie Sim 3.0
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Open API
- AGIBOT G2open rest
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Air-Gap Capable
- AGIBOT G2Yes
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Reliability
Task Success Rate
- AGIBOT G299 %
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Deployment Maturity
- AGIBOT G2production pilot
- 天链人形机器人T1prototype
IP Rating
- AGIBOT G2IP42
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Commercial
Price Tier
- AGIBOT G2150K+
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Pricing Model
- AGIBOT G2capex, pilot_fee
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Production Pilots
- AGIBOT G2Automotive seatbelt lock cylinder assembly, Consumer electronics precision tasks
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Applications
- AGIBOT G2assembly, inspection, hospitality, warehouse_transport
- 天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 55 kg | 43 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 160 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, rough_indoor | defense, education |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 71 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 3 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 500 TOPS | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | GO-1, WorkGPT, Genie | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | no_code_gui, code_python, teleoperation | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Genie Sim 3.0 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 99 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP42 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex, pilot_fee | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Automotive seatbelt lock cylinder assembly, Consumer electronics precision tasks | — |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly, inspection, hospitality, warehouse_transport | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AGIBOT G2 | 天链人形机器人T1 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AGIBOT G2, 天链人形机器人T1 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AGIBOT G2 and 天链人形机器人T1?
AGIBOT G2 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. 天链人形机器人T1 is made by TLI Robot, based in CN.
When were AGIBOT G2 and 天链人形机器人T1 launched?
AGIBOT G2 launched in 2025. 天链人形机器人T1 launched in 2024.
How do AGIBOT G2 and 天链人形机器人T1 compare on the Robo Index?
AGIBOT G2 grades AA on the Robo Index. 天链人形机器人T1 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between AGIBOT G2 and 天链人形机器人T1?
AGIBOT G2 carries up to 5 kg. 天链人形机器人T1 carries up to 8 kg.
Are AGIBOT G2 and 天链人形机器人T1 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AGIBOT G2 and 天链人形机器人T1?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AGIBOT G2 vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.