AgiBot X2 Ultra vs Armar 6
Side-by-side comparison of AgiBot X2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Armar 6 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AgiBot X2 UltraChina
- Armar 6Germany
Year First Available
- AgiBot X2 Ultra—
- Armar 62017
Verified Deployments
- AgiBot X2 Ultra0 Deployments
- Armar 60 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- AgiBot X2 Ultra$54,274–$54,754 USD
- Armar 6$87 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AgiBot X2 Ultra2 hrs
- Armar 62 hrs
Availability Status
- AgiBot X2 UltraACTIVE
- Armar 6ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AgiBot X2 Ultra131 mm
- Armar 6192 mm
Weight
- AgiBot X2 Ultra39 kg
- Armar 6150 kg
Mobility Type
- AgiBot X2 Ultrabipedal
- Armar 6bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AgiBot X2 Ultrafull bipedal
- Armar 6full bipedal
Walking Speed
- AgiBot X2 Ultra2 m/s
- Armar 63.6 m/s
Running Capable
- AgiBot X2 Ultrarun capable
- Armar 6—
Stair Climbing
- AgiBot X2 UltraNo
- Armar 6No
Terrain
- AgiBot X2 Ultraflat_indoor
- Armar 6flat indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AgiBot X2 Ultra1 kg
- Armar 610 kg
Payload (Peak)
- AgiBot X2 Ultra3 kg
- Armar 6—
Total DOF
- AgiBot X2 Ultra31
- Armar 627
Arm DOF
- AgiBot X2 Ultra7
- Armar 68
Hand DOF
- AgiBot X2 Ultra—
- Armar 64
Arm Reach
- AgiBot X2 Ultra55.8 cm
- Armar 6—
Bimanual Coordination
- AgiBot X2 UltraYes
- Armar 6Yes
Tool Use
- AgiBot X2 Ultra—
- Armar 6vendor demo
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AgiBot X2 Ultra157 TOPS
- Armar 6Various computers for processing tasks
Compute Platform
- AgiBot X2 UltraRK3588 and Orin NX
- Armar 6Intel Core i7-6700
VLM Capable
- AgiBot X2 UltraNo
- Armar 6No
Foundation Models
- AgiBot X2 Ultrafalse
- Armar 6false
Imitation Learning
- AgiBot X2 UltraNo
- Armar 6No
Teleoperation
- AgiBot X2 Ultrajoystick
- Armar 6—
Programming
- AgiBot X2 Ultracode_python, proprietary_app
- Armar 6ArmarX (custom software)
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AgiBot X2 Ultra2 hrs
- Armar 62.5 hrs
Battery Capacity
- AgiBot X2 Ultra0.5 kWh
- Armar 6—
Charging Time
- AgiBot X2 Ultra1.5 hrs
- Armar 6—
Charging Method
- AgiBot X2 Ultraauto dock
- Armar 6—
Battery Swap
- AgiBot X2 UltraYes
- Armar 6No
Safety
Human Detection Method
- AgiBot X2 Ultramulti modal
- Armar 6vision human
Software
SDK Languages
- AgiBot X2 UltraPython
- Armar 6Python
ROS Support
- AgiBot X2 Ultranone
- Armar 6No
Open API
- AgiBot X2 UltraYes
- Armar 6No
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- AgiBot X2 Ultracommercial
- Armar 6prototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AgiBot X2 Ultra$54,274–$54,754 USD
- Armar 6$87 USD
Price Tier
- AgiBot X2 Ultra40-80K
- Armar 6<10K
Pricing Model
- AgiBot X2 Ultrapurchase
- Armar 6capex
Delivery Lead Time
- AgiBot X2 Ultra2 mo
- Armar 6—
Applications
- AgiBot X2 Ultraresearch, hospitality, education
- Armar 6eldercare_assistance, hospitality
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $54,274–$54,754 USD | $87 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 131 mm | 192 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 39 kg | 150 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 3.6 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing | No | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1 kg | 10 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 31 | 27 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 8 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 55.8 cm | — |
| Bimanual Coordination | Yes | Yes |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | vendor demo |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 157 TOPS | Various computers for processing tasks |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | RK3588 and Orin NX | Intel Core i7-6700 |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models | false | false |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, proprietary_app | ArmarX (custom software) |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 2.5 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0.5 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | No |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $54,274–$54,754 USD | $87 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | 2 mo | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research, hospitality, education | eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AgiBot X2 Ultra and Armar 6?
AgiBot X2 Ultra is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Armar 6 is made by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, based in DE.
How do AgiBot X2 Ultra and Armar 6 compare on the Robo Index?
AgiBot X2 Ultra scores 65/100. Armar 6 scores 100/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between AgiBot X2 Ultra and Armar 6?
AgiBot X2 Ultra carries up to 3 kg. Armar 6 carries up to 10 kg.
Are AgiBot X2 Ultra and Armar 6 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AgiBot X2 Ultra and Armar 6?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
AgiBot X2 Ultra vs Armar 6 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.