ANYmal C vs Jueying X30
Side-by-side comparison of ANYmal C (ANYbotics AG) and Jueying X30 (Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ANYmal CSwitzerland
- Jueying X30China
Year First Available
- ANYmal C2016
- Jueying X302017
Verified Deployments
- ANYmal C0 Deployments
- Jueying X300 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- ANYmal C$120,000–$180,000 USD
- Jueying X30$85,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- ANYmal C—
- Jueying X304 hrs
Availability Status
- ANYmal CACTIVE
- Jueying X30ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- ANYmal C—
- Jueying X3020 kg
Max Speed
- ANYmal C1 m/s
- Jueying X304 m/s
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Switzerland | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $120,000–$180,000 USD | $85,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | — | 20 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | 4 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | ANYmal C | Jueying X30 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $150,000 | $85,000 |
| Payback period | 36.0 mo | 20.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $100,000 | $165,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +67% | +194% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes ANYmal C and Jueying X30?
ANYmal C is made by ANYbotics AG, based in CH. Jueying X30 is made by Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN.
When were ANYmal C and Jueying X30 launched?
ANYmal C launched in 2016. Jueying X30 launched in 2017.
How do ANYmal C and Jueying X30 compare on the Robo Index?
ANYmal C grades AA on the Robo Index. Jueying X30 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are ANYmal C and Jueying X30 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Quadruped on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between ANYmal C and Jueying X30?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags
9 min readQuadruped Robots
A 90-day playbook to deploy autonomous inspection rounds
8 min readQuadruped Robots
Decision framework: matching quadruped to terrain and mission
7 min readQuadruped Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
ANYmal C vs Jueying X30 compares two robots in the quadruped category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.