Armar 3 vs Robbyant R1
Side-by-side comparison of Armar 3 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and Robbyant R1 (Ant Lingbo Technology) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Armar 3Germany
- Robbyant R1China
Year First Available
- Armar 32006
- Robbyant R12025
Verified Deployments
- Armar 30 Deployments
- Robbyant R10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Armar 3$108,000–$216,000 USD
- Robbyant R1$55,000 USD
Availability Status
- Armar 3ACTIVE
- Robbyant R1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Armar 31700 mm
- Robbyant R1170 mm
Weight
- Armar 3150 kg
- Robbyant R1110 kg
Humanoid Subtype
- Armar 3camera stabilization exosuit
- Robbyant R1—
Walking Speed
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R11.5 m/s
Stair Climbing
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1No
Terrain
- Armar 3research
- Robbyant R1flat indoor, uneven outdoor
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- Armar 363
- Robbyant R134
Arm DOF
- Armar 38
- Robbyant R12
Hand DOF
- Armar 34
- Robbyant R1—
Bimanual Coordination
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1No
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Armar 3Four high-end PCs with Intel Core i7-6700 CPU, 32 GB RAM, 500GB SSD, plus one GeForce GTX 1080 GPU with 8 GB RAM
- Robbyant R1MX6800 depth engine chip
VLM Capable
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1No
Imitation Learning
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1No
Programming
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1Open-source
Battery & Power
Battery Swap
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1No
Software
SDK Languages
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1Python
ROS Support
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1No
Open API
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1Yes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Armar 3—
- Robbyant R1commercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Armar 3$108,000–$216,000 USD
- Robbyant R1$55,000 USD
Price Tier
- Armar 310-20K
- Robbyant R140-80K
Pricing Model
- Armar 3purchase
- Robbyant R1—
Applications
- Armar 3assembly
- Robbyant R1hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2006 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $108,000–$216,000 USD | $55,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1700 mm | 170 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 150 kg | 110 kg |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | camera stabilization exosuit | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | research | flat indoor, uneven outdoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | 63 | 34 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 8 | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Four high-end PCs with Intel Core i7-6700 CPU, 32 GB RAM, 500GB SSD, plus one GeForce GTX 1080 GPU with 8 GB RAM | MX6800 depth engine chip |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming (values differ) | — | Open-source |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | No |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $108,000–$216,000 USD | $55,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly | hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Mobility Type, Running Capable, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Foundation Models, Teleoperation, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Armar 3 | Robbyant R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $162,000 | $55,000 |
| Payback period | 38.9 mo | 13.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $88,000 | $195,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +54% | +355% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Armar 3 and Robbyant R1?
Armar 3 is made by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, based in DE. Robbyant R1 is made by Ant Lingbo Technology, based in CN.
When were Armar 3 and Robbyant R1 launched?
Armar 3 launched in 2006. Robbyant R1 launched in 2025.
How do Armar 3 and Robbyant R1 compare on the Robo Index?
Armar 3 grades B on the Robo Index. Robbyant R1 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Armar 3 and Robbyant R1 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Armar 3 and Robbyant R1?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Armar 3 vs Robbyant R1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.