MOTOMAN HC30PL vs UR10e
Side-by-side comparison of MOTOMAN HC30PL (Motoman) and UR10e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MOTOMAN HC30PLJapan
- UR10eDenmark
Year First Available
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2019
- UR10e2008
Verified Deployments
- MOTOMAN HC30PL0 Deployments
- UR10e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD
Availability Status
- MOTOMAN HC30PLACTIVE
- UR10eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- MOTOMAN HC30PL5 kg
- UR10e10 kg
Max TCP Speed
- MOTOMAN HC30PL3.1 m/s
- UR10e1 m/s
IP Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLIP54
- UR10eIP54
Reach
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1,300 mm
- UR10e1,300 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- MOTOMAN HC30PL6
- UR10e6
Repeatability
- MOTOMAN HC30PL±0.03 mm
- UR10e±0.05 mm
Robot Weight
- MOTOMAN HC30PL140 kg
- UR10e33.5 kg
Mounting Options
- MOTOMAN HC30PLfloor, ceiling, wall
- UR10efloor, ceiling, wall, rail
Safety
Safety Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO/TS 15066
- UR10eCat3 PLd
Force/Torque Sensing
- MOTOMAN HC30PLnone
- UR10ewrist external
Duty Cycle
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- UR10e24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1 hrs
- UR10e—
No-Code Capable
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- UR10eYes
Offline Programming
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- UR10eYes
Programming Interface
- MOTOMAN HC30PLAUBO SDK
- UR10eteach_pendant, no_code_gui
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO 9409-1-A50
- UR10eiso 9283
Tool Changer Support
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- UR10eautomatic
Integrated F/T Sensor
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- UR10eYes
Wrist Power Supply
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- UR10e24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- UR10ePython, C++, URScript, .NET
ROS Compatible
- MOTOMAN HC30PLNo
- UR10e—
Fieldbus Protocols
- MOTOMAN HC30PLEtherCAT
- UR10eMODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet
Digital Twin Support
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- UR10eYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD
Warranty
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2 yrs
- UR10e—
Lead Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL4 wks
- UR10e—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 5 kg | 10 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 3.1 m/s | 1 m/s |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Reach | 1,300 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | 33.5 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | floor, ceiling, wall, rail |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | wrist external |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | AUBO SDK | teach_pendant, no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | automatic |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, URScript, .NET |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT | MODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MOTOMAN HC30PL | UR10e |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $60,000 | $46,153 |
| Payback period | 14.4 mo | 11.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $190,000 | $203,847 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +317% | +442% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MOTOMAN HC30PL and UR10e?
MOTOMAN HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP. UR10e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
When were MOTOMAN HC30PL and UR10e launched?
MOTOMAN HC30PL launched in 2019. UR10e launched in 2008.
How do MOTOMAN HC30PL and UR10e compare on the Robo Index?
MOTOMAN HC30PL grades AA on the Robo Index. UR10e grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of MOTOMAN HC30PL compare to UR10e?
MOTOMAN HC30PL has a reach of 1700 mm. UR10e has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are MOTOMAN HC30PL and UR10e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MOTOMAN HC30PL and UR10e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MOTOMAN HC30PL vs UR10e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.