Robbyant R1 vs T-HR3
Side-by-side comparison of Robbyant R1 (Ant Lingbo Technology) and T-HR3 (Toyota) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Robbyant R1China
- T-HR3Japan
Year First Available
- Robbyant R12025
- T-HR32017
Verified Deployments
- Robbyant R10 Deployments
- T-HR30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Robbyant R1$55,000 USD
- T-HR3Contact for quote
Availability Status
- Robbyant R1ACTIVE
- T-HR3ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- Robbyant R1110 kg
- T-HR375 kg
Height
- Robbyant R1170 mm
- T-HR3154 mm
Mobility Type
- Robbyant R1—
- T-HR3bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Robbyant R1—
- T-HR3research platform
Walking Speed
- Robbyant R11.5 m/s
- T-HR3—
Stair Climbing
- Robbyant R1No
- T-HR3No
Terrain
- Robbyant R1flat indoor, uneven outdoor
- T-HR3flat indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Robbyant R1—
- T-HR32 kg
Total DOF
- Robbyant R134
- T-HR332
Arm DOF
- Robbyant R12
- T-HR35
Hand DOF
- Robbyant R1—
- T-HR310
Bimanual Coordination
- Robbyant R1No
- T-HR3Yes
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Robbyant R1MX6800 depth engine chip
- T-HR3Torque Servo Module
VLM Capable
- Robbyant R1No
- T-HR3No
Foundation Models
- Robbyant R1—
- T-HR3false
Imitation Learning
- Robbyant R1No
- T-HR3No
Programming
- Robbyant R1Open-source
- T-HR3Master Maneuvering System
Battery & Power
Battery Swap
- Robbyant R1No
- T-HR3No
Software
SDK Languages
- Robbyant R1Python
- T-HR3Master Maneuvering System
ROS Support
- Robbyant R1No
- T-HR3No
Open API
- Robbyant R1Yes
- T-HR3No
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Robbyant R1commercial
- T-HR3prototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Robbyant R1$55,000 USD
- T-HR3Contact for quote
Price Tier
- Robbyant R140-80K
- T-HR3—
Applications
- Robbyant R1hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking
- T-HR3eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $55,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 110 kg | 75 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 170 mm | 154 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | research platform |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing | No | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor, uneven outdoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 32 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 2 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | MX6800 depth engine chip | Torque Servo Module |
| VLM Capable | No | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning | No | No |
| Programming (values differ) | Open-source | Master Maneuvering System |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Battery Swap | No | No |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | Master Maneuvering System |
| ROS Support | No | No |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $55,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Robbyant R1 | T-HR3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $55,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 13.2 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $195,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +355% | — |
T-HR3 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Robbyant R1 and T-HR3?
Robbyant R1 is made by Ant Lingbo Technology, based in CN. T-HR3 is made by Toyota, based in JP.
When were Robbyant R1 and T-HR3 launched?
Robbyant R1 launched in 2025. T-HR3 launched in 2017.
How do Robbyant R1 and T-HR3 compare on the Robo Index?
Robbyant R1 grades AA on the Robo Index. T-HR3 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Robbyant R1 and T-HR3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Robbyant R1 and T-HR3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Robbyant R1 vs T-HR3 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.