Robbyant R1 vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of Robbyant R1 (Ant Lingbo Technology) and 天链人形机器人T1 (TLI Robot) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Robbyant R1China
- 天链人形机器人T1China
Year First Available
- Robbyant R12025
- 天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
- Robbyant R10 Deployments
- 天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Robbyant R1$55,000 USD
- 天链人形机器人T1Contact for quote
Availability Status
- Robbyant R1ACTIVE
- 天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- Robbyant R1110 kg
- 天链人形机器人T143 kg
Height
- Robbyant R1170 mm
- 天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Mobility Type
- Robbyant R1—
- 天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Robbyant R1—
- 天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
- Robbyant R11.5 m/s
- 天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Stair Climbing
- Robbyant R1No
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Terrain
- Robbyant R1flat indoor, uneven outdoor
- 天链人形机器人T1defense, education
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Robbyant R1—
- 天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
- Robbyant R1—
- 天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
- Robbyant R134
- 天链人形机器人T171
Arm DOF
- Robbyant R12
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Hand DOF
- Robbyant R1—
- 天链人形机器人T13
Bimanual Coordination
- Robbyant R1No
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Robbyant R1MX6800 depth engine chip
- 天链人形机器人T1—
VLM Capable
- Robbyant R1No
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Imitation Learning
- Robbyant R1No
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Programming
- Robbyant R1Open-source
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Battery & Power
Battery Swap
- Robbyant R1No
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Software
SDK Languages
- Robbyant R1Python
- 天链人形机器人T1—
ROS Support
- Robbyant R1No
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Open API
- Robbyant R1Yes
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Robbyant R1commercial
- 天链人形机器人T1prototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Robbyant R1$55,000 USD
- 天链人形机器人T1Contact for quote
Price Tier
- Robbyant R140-80K
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Applications
- Robbyant R1hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking
- 天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $55,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 110 kg | 43 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 170 mm | 160 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor, uneven outdoor | defense, education |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 71 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | MX6800 depth engine chip | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | Open-source | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $55,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, medical assistance, tour guiding, cooking | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Running Capable, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Foundation Models, Teleoperation, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Robbyant R1 | 天链人形机器人T1 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $55,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 13.2 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $195,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +355% | — |
天链人形机器人T1 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Robbyant R1 and 天链人形机器人T1?
Robbyant R1 is made by Ant Lingbo Technology, based in CN. 天链人形机器人T1 is made by TLI Robot, based in CN.
When were Robbyant R1 and 天链人形机器人T1 launched?
Robbyant R1 launched in 2025. 天链人形机器人T1 launched in 2024.
How do Robbyant R1 and 天链人形机器人T1 compare on the Robo Index?
Robbyant R1 grades AA on the Robo Index. 天链人形机器人T1 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Robbyant R1 and 天链人形机器人T1 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Robbyant R1 and 天链人形机器人T1?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Robbyant R1 vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.