CL801 vs Jueying X30
Side-by-side comparison of CL801 (Coolight Technology Co., Ltd.) and Jueying X30 (Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Prices in
View savedOptimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CL801China
- Jueying X30China
Year First Available
- CL801—
- Jueying X302017
Verified Deployments
- CL8010 Deployments
- Jueying X300 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- CL801$173,000 USD
- Jueying X30$85,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- CL801—
- Jueying X304 hrs
Availability Status
- CL801ACTIVE
- Jueying X30ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- CL801—
- Jueying X3020 kg
Max Speed
- CL801—
- Jueying X304 m/s
IP Rating
- CL801IP67
- Jueying X30—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $173,000 USD | $85,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 20 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 4 m/s |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP67 | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, Autonomy Level
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | CL801 | Jueying X30 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $173,000 | $85,000 |
| Payback period | 41.5 mo | 20.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $77,000 | $165,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +45% | +194% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes CL801 and Jueying X30?
CL801 is made by Coolight Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Jueying X30 is made by Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How much does CL801 cost compared to Jueying X30?
CL801 is listed at $173,000. Jueying X30 is listed at $85,000.
How do CL801 and Jueying X30 compare on the Robo Index?
CL801 grades BBB on the Robo Index. Jueying X30 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are CL801 and Jueying X30 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Quadruped on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between CL801 and Jueying X30?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags
9 min readQuadruped Robots
A 90-day playbook to deploy autonomous inspection rounds
8 min readQuadruped Robots
Decision framework: matching quadruped to terrain and mission
7 min readQuadruped Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
CL801 vs Jueying X30 compares two robots in the quadruped category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.