CyberDog vs DEEPRobotics Lynx
Side-by-side comparison of CyberDog (Xiaomi) and DEEPRobotics Lynx (Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CyberDogChina
- DEEPRobotics LynxChina
Year First Available
- CyberDog2021
- DEEPRobotics Lynx—
Verified Deployments
- CyberDog0 Deployments
- DEEPRobotics Lynx0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- CyberDog$1,370 USD
- DEEPRobotics LynxContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- CyberDog1.5 hrs
- DEEPRobotics Lynx—
Availability Status
- CyberDogACTIVE
- DEEPRobotics LynxACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- CyberDog3 kg
- DEEPRobotics Lynx—
Max Speed
- CyberDog3.2 m/s
- DEEPRobotics Lynx—
Autonomy Level
- CyberDogpartially autonomous
- DEEPRobotics Lynx—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $1,370 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 3.2 m/s | — |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | partially autonomous | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | CyberDog | DEEPRobotics Lynx |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $1,370 | No price |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $248,630 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +18148% | — |
DEEPRobotics Lynx has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes CyberDog and DEEPRobotics Lynx?
CyberDog is made by Xiaomi, based in CN. DEEPRobotics Lynx is made by Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do CyberDog and DEEPRobotics Lynx compare on the Robo Score?
CyberDog scores 63.2 on the Robo Score. DEEPRobotics Lynx scores 51.8. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are CyberDog and DEEPRobotics Lynx in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Quadruped on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between CyberDog and DEEPRobotics Lynx?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags
9 min readQuadruped Robots
A 90-day playbook to deploy autonomous inspection rounds
8 min readQuadruped Robots
Decision framework: matching quadruped to terrain and mission
7 min readQuadruped Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
CyberDog vs DEEPRobotics Lynx compares two robots in the quadruped category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.