da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: A REVIEW OF AN ARTICLE THAT EVALUATED THE SAFETY AND PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED SINGLE-PORT VERSUS MULTI-PORT SURGICAL STAGING FOR APPARENT EARLY-STAGE ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WAS PERFORMED. THE RETROSPECTIVE, PROPENSITY-MATCHED STUDY ANALYZED 100 PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED HYSTERECTOMY WITH BILATERAL SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY AND NODAL STAGING USING THE DA VINCI SURGICAL SYSTEM BETWEEN JANUARY 2021 AND DECEMBER 2024. A TOTAL OF 3 PATIENTS IN THE SINGLE-PORT GROUP EXPERIENCED POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS WITHIN 30 DAYS, INCLUDING SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AND ABDOMINAL PAIN REQUIRING READMISSION, AND HEMOPERITONEUM REQUIRING SURGICAL RE-INTERVENTION. NO DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS WERE REPORTED, AND THE AUTHORS DID NOT REPORT ANY EVENTS CAUSED BY ANY INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. (ISI) DEVICE. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO CONTACT THE AUTHOR. NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN RECEIVED.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: A REVIEW OF THE ARTICLE REPORTED THE FOLLOWING ADVERSE EVENT. IN THE DA VINCI SP GROUP REASONS FOR READMISSION WERE: SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AND ABDOMINAL PAIN AND 1 PATIENT REQUIRED A BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS. IN THE DA VINCI XI GROUP REASONS FOR READMISSION WERE URETERAL FISTULA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION, AND ABDOMINAL PAIN. SEVERE COMPLICATIONS (GRADE 3 OR MORE) IN THE DA VINCI SP GROUP INCLUDED HEMOPERITONEUM REQUIRING SURGERY (N 1); WHILE IN THE DA VINCI XI GROUP INCLUDED HEMOPERITONEUM REQUIRING SURGERY (N = 1) AND URETERAL FISTULA (N = 1). ALL SEVERE COMPLICATIONS OCCURRED WITHIN 30 DAYS.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE, A WHITE FRAGMENT FROM THE HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT. WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED, THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING DISSECTION. THE FRAGMENT WAS NOT RETRIEVED AS IT COULD NOT BE FOUND. AN X-RAY WAS CONDUCTED POST-OPERATIVELY TO CHECK FOR FRAGMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY, UTILIZING A BACKUP HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT. AFTERWARDS, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE INSTRUMENT WAS WOBBLING. THE PATIENT HAS NOT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO ANY POST-SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO RETAINING A FOREIGN OBJECT.

Mako Robotic-Arm — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: VERIFICATION FAILED AND SUBSEQUENT AUTO ARM TEST ALSO FAILED. CABLE AND CAMERA CLEANED. ROBOT RESTARTED SEVERAL TIMES. ROBOT REPOSITIONED AND CAMERA ANGLE CHANGED. THE SURGERY WAS CANCELLED AND THE NEXT SURGERY IN THE OPERATING ROOM TOOK PLACE APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR AFTER WE STARTED THE FAILED REGISTRATION OF THE ROBOT.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED MYOMECTOMY SURGICAL PROCEDURE, A PORTION OF THE BLACK RUBBER ON THE TROCAR CAPS BROKE OFF AND FELL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. THE UNIVERSAL SEAL WAS IDENTIFIED WHEN THE SURGICAL TEAM NOTICED A DEVICE FRAGMENT IN THE PELVIS. THE CAUSE OF THE FRAGMENT'S DETACHMENT REMAINS UNKNOWN. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED BY THE SURGICAL ASSISTANT USING A LAPAROSCOPIC GRASPER, AND ITS RETRIEVAL WAS CONFIRMED BY MATCHING IT TO THE INNER CAP SEAL. NO ADDITIONAL SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS NEEDED FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE FRAGMENT, AND NO POST-OPERATIVE TESTS WERE PERFORMED TO CHECK FOR REMAINING FRAGMENTS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY WITHOUT THE USE OF A BACKUP INSTRUMENT. THE PATIENT HAS NOT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO ANY POST-SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO RETAINING A FOREIGN OBJECT.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED BARIATRIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON DISCOVERED FRAGMENTS WERE BROKEN OFF FROM THE GASKET OF THE HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT. THE DEVICE FRAGMENT FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT WHILE GRASPING, WHICH THE SURGEON BELIEVES WAS CAUSED BY INTRAOPERATIVE CLEANING OR COLLISION. THE FRAGMENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED BY THE FIRST ASSISTANT UNDER DIRECT VISUALIZATION USING LAPAROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS, AND ITS RETRIEVAL WAS CONFIRMED BY THE SCRUB NURSE WHO MATCHED THE FRAGMENT TO THE INSTRUMENT'S BREAK POINT. NO ADDITIONAL SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT, AND NO POST-OPERATIVE TESTS SUCH AS AN X-RAY OR ULTRASOUND WERE PERFORMED TO CHECK FOR REMAINING FRAGMENTS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY. A BACKUP INSTRUMENT, THE HARMONIC SCALPEL, WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAS NOT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO ANY POST-SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO RETAINING A FOREIGN OBJECT. THE INSTRUMENT RECOGNITION ISSUE OCCURRED ON THE SAME HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT THAT HAD THE BROKEN FRAGMENT. THE INSTRUMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN TO ISI FOR EVALUATION; HOWEVER, THE FRAGMENT HAS BEEN DISCARDED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNE

Mazor X — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD SHOWN SOME IMPROVEMENT SINCE THE SURGERY. THE SUSPECTED CAUSE WAS A PATIENT SHIFT DUE TO LEANING WHILE DRILLING, LEADING TO THE SKIVE.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

Mazor X — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative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

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: A REVIEW OF THE ARTICLE REPORTED THE FOLLOWING ADVERSE EVENT. URINARY LEAKAGE OCCURRED IN ONE PATIENT IN THE NONRENORRHAPHY GROUP AND TWO PATIENTS IN THE RENORRHAPHY GROUP; HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE GROUPS (P=0.9399). IN THE NONRENORRHAPHY GROUP, ONE PATIENT DEVELOPED A URINOMA REQUIRING READMISSION. URINARY LEAKAGE DID NOT IMPROVE WITH URETERAL STENTING AND DRAINAGE BUT WAS ULTIMATELY RESOLVED AFTER FIBRIN INFUSION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED TRANSORAL THYROIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE WHITE PART OF THE TIP OF THE HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT FELL OFF. UPON INSPECTION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE FRONT TIP WAS SLIGHTLY BROKEN, SO ANOTHER HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT WAS USED INSTEAD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. (ISI) FOLLOWED UP WITH THE INITIAL REPORTER AND OBTAINED THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE TEFLON PAD ON THE HARMONICA ACE INSTRUMENT WAS DAMAGED AND COMPLETELY DETACHED FROM THE INSTRUMENT. THE INSTRUMENT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE. THE INSTRUMENT DID NOT COLLIDE WITH ANY OTHER INSTRUMENT OR TOOL DURING PROCEDURE. A FRAGMENT FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD NO RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL DUE TO ANY POST-SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS. THE INSTRUMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN TO ISI FOR EVALUATION; HOWEVER, NO PHOTOS OR VIDEOS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT BROKE AND FRAGMENTS FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WERE NO INSTRUMENT COLLISIONS DURING THE CASE. THE FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED DURING THE SAME SURGICAL PROCEDURE WHICH WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY USING A BACKUP HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF A HARMONIC ACE INSTRUMENT BROKE AND A PLASTIC FRAGMENT FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE WHICH WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY USING A BACKUP INSTRUMENT.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: A REVIEW OF A LITERATURE ARTICLE "BENCH SURGERY WITH ROBOT-ASSISTED KIDNEY AUTO-TRANSPLANTATION FOR COMPLEX KIDNEY TUMORS: TECHNIQUE AND OUTCOMES FROM A SINGLE CENTER" WAS PERFORMED. FROM JANUARY 2018 TO MAY 2021, FOUR PATIENTS WITH SOLITARY KIDNEY TUMORS AND EIGHT WITH BILATERAL KIDNEY TUMORS UNDERWENT BENCH SURGERY (BENS) AND ROBOT-ASSISTED KIDNEY AUTO-TRANSPLANTATION (RAKAT). THE ARTICLE NOTED THAT THAT DURING THESE DV SURGERIES, "THREE PATIENTS PRESENTED GRADE IV POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, AS FOLLOWS: ONE DEVELOPED SEPTIC SHOCK THAT RESOLVED WITH TREATMENT WITH BROAD-SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTICS AND SUPPORTIVE CARE IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT. WHILE OTHER TWO OTHER DEVELOPED DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION (DGF) THAT RESOLVED WITH TEMPORARY DIALYSIS." THE AUTHORS CONCLUDED THAT BENS WITH RAKAT IS AN ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF HIGH-COMPLEXITY RENAL TUMORS THAT ARE UNSUITABLE FOR IN SITU PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY (PN). LARGER PROSPECTIVE STUDIES WITH LONGER FOLLOW-UP ARE REQUIRED TO FURTHER ASSESS THE FINDINGS. THERE WERE NO SPECIFIC DA VINCI DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS REPORTED, NOR DID THE AUTHOR ALLEGE THAT INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. (ISI) PRODUCTS CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO ANY ADVERSE EVENT. I

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: REFER TO H11 FOR FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION.

Mako Robotic-Arm — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: AS ORIGINALLY REPORTED BY MPS: "PATIENT STARTED WITH 6 DEGREES OF VARUS. MAKO SAID HIS FINAL LIMB ALIGNMENT WAS 1 DEGREE OF VALGUS BUT THE PATIENT IS NOW IN 5 DEGREES OF VALGUS. SURGEON WANTS TO UNDERSTAND WHY. CASE TYPE / APPLICATION: TKA 2.0" ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: SURGERY ORIGINALLY PERFORMED (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2025, MPS WAS MADE AWARE THAT THE PATIENT WAS 'NOW IN 5 DEGREES OF VALGUS' AND THAT THERE WERE PATIENT COMPLAINTS: PATIENT HAS FUNCTIONAL WEAKNESS AND ANKLE/FOOT PAIN.

Mako Robotic-Arm — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: NO NEW INFORMATION.

ExcelsiusGPS — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT RELINE MAS REDUCTION SCREWS WERE UTILIZED WITH THE ROBOT FOR THIS CASE. BLACK EXCELSIUS ARRAY WITH AN ADAPTER WAS UTILIZED. TWO EXCELSIUS ARRAYS WERE SET UP WITH MAS REDUCTION DRIVERS AND VERIFICATION OF THESE ARRAYS WAS CHALLENGING. THE CAMERA WAS HAVING A HARD TIME SEEING THESE ARRAYS. SPHERES WERE MANIPULATED MULTIPLE TIMES AND BOTH DRIVER ARRAYS WERE TRIED. ONCE THE CAMERA WAS ABLE TO SEE THE ARRAYS, IT TOOK MULTIPLE VERIFICATION ATTEMPTS AND MANIPULATION.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE HARMONIC ACE TIP WAS BROKEN AND THE TEFLON PAD WAS SCRATCHED. THE USER COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE USING A BACKUP HARMONIC ACE WITH NO FURTHER ISSUE REPORTED. NO KNOWN IMPACT OR PATIENT CONSEQUENCE WAS REPORTED. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. (ISI) FOLLOWED UP WITH THE INITIAL REPORTER AND OBTAINED THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE INSTRUMENT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE WITH NO DAMAGE OBSERVED. THERE WAS NO INSTRUMENT COLLISION DURING THE PROCEDURE. A FRAGMENT OF THE INSTRUMENT FELL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DA VINCI-ASSISTED SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE MONOPOLAR CURVED SCISSORS (MCS) TIP COVER ACCESSORY INSTALLED ON AN MCS INSTRUMENT CAME OFF AS THE SURGICAL STAFF WAS REMOVING THE INSTRUMENT. THE STAFF WAS ABLE TO RECOVER THE MCS TIP COVER ACCESSORY DURING THE SAME SURGICAL PROCEDURE WHICH WAS COMPLETED ROBOTICALLY. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. (ISI) FOLLOWED UP WITH THE INITIAL REPORTER AND OBTAINED THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE INITIAL REPORTER SAID THAT THE MCS TIP COVER ACCESSORY FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT WHEN THE CUSTOMER WAS TRYING TO REMOVE THE INSTRUMENT. THE TIP COVER WAS IMMEDIATELY RETRIEVED. THE MCS TIP COVER ACCESSORY WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND NO DAMAGE OR NOTHING OUT OF ORDINARY WAS NOTED. THE MCS INSTRUMENT DID NOT COLLIDE WITH ANY OTHER INSTRUMENT. THE MCS TIP COVER ACCESSORY WAS PROPERLY INSTALLED. THE INSTRUMENT TIP WAS STRAIGHTENED UPON REMOVAL. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE/HOLES NOTED ON THE MCS TIP COVER ACCESSORY. THE MCS INSTRUMENT WAS FUNCTIONING AS EXPECTED DURING THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE.

da Vinci Surgical System — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED USING PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE, AND SCOPUS TO IDENTIFY STUDIES PUBLISHED UP TO NOVEMBER 2024. A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ARTICLE, ¿RELIABILITY OF THE DA VINCI ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND POOLED ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL FAILURES¿ WAS PERFORMED AND 3,308,134 PROCEDURES WERE REVIEWED WITH 1,799 REPORTED EVENTS FROM 25 STUDIES. ALL THE INCLUDED STUDIES WERE RETROSPECTIVE, COVERING PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 2000 AND 2021. THE POOLED MALFUNCTION RATE WAS 1.0% (95% CI: 0.9-1.2%). THE POOLED RATE OF DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS WAS 0.1% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.1%); INSTRUMENT MALFUNCTIONS ACCOUNTED FOR 0.4% (95% CI: 0.3-0.5%). THE OVERALL MALFUNCTION-RELATED CONVERSION RATE WAS 0.09% (95%CI: 0.06-0.11%), WITH CONVERSION TO OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN 0.1% AND 0.04% OF THE TOTAL PROCEDURES, RESPECTIVELY. THE POOLED RATE OF MALFUNCTION-RELATED INJURIES WAS 0.01% (95% CI: 0.01-0.02%), WITH NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOMES. NINETEEN STUDIES REPORTED DATA ON TECHNICAL FAILURES OF THE DA VINCI ROBOTIC SYSTEM, INCLUDING COMPLETE INFORMATION ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SURGERIES PERFORMED AND THE CORRESPONDING MALFUNCTIONS OBS

Crash With

Passenger Car

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Rear Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

15

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Front Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 6:01 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Guadalupe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and began to slow for a queue of traffic at the intersection at [XXX]. A passenger car traveling southbound on [XXX] approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Passenger Car

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Stopped

SV Contact Area

Front Left

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Backing

CP Contact Area

Rear Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Intersection

Weather

Clear

Investigating Agency

Austin Police Department

Make

HYUNDAI

Model

Ioniq 5

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

Our car was stopped at the intersection of [XXX] and [XXX], behind a red Ford Fusion. The Fusion suddenly reversed, struck our front bumper, and then left the scene in a hit-and-run. Damage is minimal: a slightly cracked bumper.

Crash With

Other Fixed Object

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Front Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

1

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Parking Lot

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 1:55 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an automatic barrier arm at a parking lot located at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound to exit a parking lot located at [XXX] and came to a stop for a closed automatic barrier arm. The automatic barrier arm then opened, and the Waymo AV began to proceed through the parking lot exit at low speed. The automatic barrier arm then closed. As the Waymo AV attempted to proceed the front of the Waymo AV made contact with the closed automatic barrier arm. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The automatic barrier arm sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Passenger Car

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

21

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Front Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 1:09 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX]. A passenger car exiting a driveway on the north side of [XXX] entered the roadway in front of a van parked at the curb, and the front of the passenger car made contact with the passenger side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

SUV

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Stopped

SV Contact Area

Rear Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Front Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Intersection

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 9:05 PM CT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and came to a stop for a red light at the intersection at [XXX]. An SUV approached the Waymo AV from behind, and the front of the SUV made contact with the rear of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

SUV

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Minor W/O Hospitalization

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Stopped

SV Contact Area

Rear Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Front Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Intersection

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 6:52 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northwestbound on [XXX] and was slowing to a stop for the stop sign at the intersection with [XXX]. An SUV approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the SUV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. One of the two passengers in the Waymo AV reported minor injuries. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Pickup Truck

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Stopped

SV Contact Area

Rear

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Changing Lanes

CP Contact Area

Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 11:26 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in the rightmost lane on [XXX] when it came to a stop to yield to a stationary passenger car with its hazard lights activated in the Waymo AV's lane of travel near the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV had its hazard lights activated, reversed a short distance, and then came to a stop. A pickup truck approached the Waymo AV from behind and came to a stop. The pickup truck then attempted to change lanes and pass to the left of the Waymo AV, and the passenger side of the pickup truck made contact with the rear driver side of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Other Fixed Object

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Bottom

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

10

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Parking Lot

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 8:16 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Chandler, Arizona was in a collision involving an elevated gate track in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in a parking lot at [XXX] through a gate opening when the bottom of the Waymo AV made contact with the elevated gate track. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Non-Motorist: Cyclist

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Minor W/ Hospitalization

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

SV Contact Area

Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Passing

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Intersection

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 10:04 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing southeast in the right lane on [XXX] for a red light at the intersection at [XXX] when a Waymo AV passenger opted to end their ride prior to reaching their originally specified drop-off location, prompting the Waymo AV to park in-lane and activate its hazard lights for the passenger drop-off. A cyclist was traveling southeastbound on [XXX] in between vehicles in the right lane and vehicles stopped at the curb. As the cyclist passed the Waymo AV to the right, a Waymo AV passenger opened the front passenger side door and the front passenger side door of the Waymo AV made contact with the cyclist. The passengers in the vehicle were not belted at the time of the collision, as they were preparing to exit the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. The cyclist reported minor injuries and was transported from the scene in an ambulance. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because an individual involved was transported from the scene to a hospital for medical treatment and a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Other, see Narrative

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Front Right, Bottom

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

23

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Other, see Narrative

CP Contact Area

Unknown

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 11:35 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving an unattended bicycle in the roadway on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in the rightmost lane of [XXX] when the Waymo AV's front and undercarriage made contact with an unattended bicycle that was laying in the middle of the roadway. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. One of the passengers in the Waymo AV was not belted at the time of the collision. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

SUV

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

SV Contact Area

Rear

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Backing

CP Contact Area

Rear Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 11:03 PM ET a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Atlanta, Georgia was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb facing north on [XXX] when an SUV reversed out of a driveway on the west side of [XXX], and the rear of the SUV made contact with the rear driver side of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Passenger Car

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

SV Contact Area

Rear

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 4:56 PM MST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb facing south on [XXX] for a passenger drop-off with hazard lights activated. While the Waymo AV remained parked, a passenger car traveling southbound on [XXX] with its front passenger side door open proceeded to pass to the left of the Waymo AV. The front passenger door of the passenger car made contact with the rear driver side of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The passenger seated in the Waymo AV was not belted at the time of the collision, having not put the seatbelt on at the start of the trip. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Van

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

SV Contact Area

Rear

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Passing

CP Contact Area

Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 7:57 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked in-lane facing north on [XXX] with hazards activated for a passenger drop-off. While the Waymo AV remained parked, a van traveling northbound approached the Waymo AV from behind, and attempted to pass to the left of the Waymo AV. A Waymo AV passenger then opened the rear driver side door of the Waymo AV, and the passenger side of the van made contact with the rear driver side door of the stationary Waymo AV. The passengers seated in the Waymo AV were not belted at the time of the collision, as they were preparing to exit the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Heavy Truck

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Stopped

SV Contact Area

Left

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Left

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Investigating Agency

San Francisco Police Department

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 11:17 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on a narrow portion of [XXX], with vehicles parked at the curb in both directions, when it came to a stop to yield to a heavy truck traveling eastbound on [XXX]. As the heavy truck passed by the stopped Waymo AV, the driver side of the heavy truck made contact with the driver side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Pickup Truck

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Left

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

8

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Backing

CP Contact Area

Rear Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 4:41 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and approached a pick-up truck that was stopped in-lane facing east after making a left turn towards an alley behind [XXX]. As the Waymo AV passed the pick up truck, the pickup truck reversed and the rear of the pickup truck made contact with the driver side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

SUV

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Front Left, Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

6

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

CP Contact Area

Left

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Investigating Agency

Chandler Police Department

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 5:34 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Mesa, Arizona was in a collision involving an autonomous vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked facing east for a passenger pick-up on [XXX] adjacent to a parking lot at [XXX]. A passenger entered the Waymo AV and the Waymo AV began to proceed forward momentarily before the passenger opened the front passenger side door and exited the Waymo AV, prompting the Waymo AV to stop. The passenger then re-entered the Waymo AV and the Waymo AV proceeded to pass to the left of a different Waymo AV stopped facing east on [XXX]. While the first Waymo AV was passing the stopped Waymo AV, the passenger in the moving Waymo AV opened the front passenger side door, which then made contact with the driver side mirror of the stopped Waymo AV. The passenger in the moving Waymo AV was not belted at the time of the collision. At the time of the impact, the Level 4 ADS of both Waymo AVs were engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Passenger Car

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Stopped

SV Contact Area

Rear Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

CP Contact Area

Front Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Intersection

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 2:46 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing south in the rightmost lane on [XXX] for a red light at the intersection at [XXX]. While the Waymo AV remained stopped, a passenger car traveling southbound in the rightmost lane on [XXX] approached the Waymo AV from behind and the front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because of airbag deployment and a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Pickup Truck

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Front Left

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

9

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Entering Traffic

CP Contact Area

Front

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Cloudy

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 7:19 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwestbound on [XXX]. As the Waymo AV proceeded past a heavy truck parked on the righthand curb, a pickup truck traveling southeastbound in an alley by [XXX] entered [XXX] in front of the heavy truck and into the Waymo AV's lane of travel. The front driver side of the pickup truck made contact with the front passenger side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Passenger Car

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

SV Contact Area

Front Right

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Backing

CP Contact Area

Rear Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 3:47 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at Hayden Road. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb facing east on [XXX] when a passenger car that was parked directly in front of the Waymo AV proceeded to reverse, and the rear of the passenger car made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

SUV

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Front

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

8

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Making Left Turn

CP Contact Area

Front Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Intersection

Weather

Clear

Investigating Agency

San Francisco Police Department

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 12:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] and slowing to a stop for a stop sign at the intersection at [XXX]. An SUV that was traveling southbound on [XXX] initiated a left turn at the intersection onto eastbound [XXX]. The SUV continued turning left, crossing the centerline of [XXX] and entering into the Waymo AV's lane of travel. The front of the SUV then made contact with the front driver side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away and airbag deployment. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

SUV

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Proceeding Straight

SV Contact Area

Left

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

22

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Making Right Turn

CP Contact Area

Front Left

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June[XXX], 2025 at 7:07 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southeastbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when an SUV traveling ahead of the Waymo AV southeastbound on [XXX] in the second from the right lane initiated a right turn into a parking garage entrance on the south side of [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was passing the SUV, the SUV crossed the lane line, into the Waymo AV's lane of travel, and the front passenger side of the SUV made contact with the driver side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. The passenger in the Waymo AV was not belted at the time of the collision. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

Crash With

Van

Highest Injury Severity Alleged

Property Damage. No Injured Reported

SV Pre-Crash Movement

Parked

SV Contact Area

Rear

SV Precrash Speed (MPH)

0

CP Pre-Crash Movement

Passing

CP Contact Area

Right

Within ODD?

Yes

Automation System Engaged?

ADS

Roadway Type

Street

Weather

Clear

Make

JAGUAR

Model

I-PACE

SV is the subject vehicle — the one whose operator filed the report. CP is the crash partner, the other party. Contact area is where each was struck. NHTSA requires a report for any crash involving the driving system regardless of fault.

On June [XXX], 2025 at 10:36 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a minivan on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb facing west on [XXX] for a passenger pick-up with hazard lights activated. A minivan that was traveling southbound on [XXX] and making a right turn onto westbound [XXX] approached the stationary Waymo AV from behind, momentarily stopped, and proceeded to pass to the left of the Waymo AV. The passenger side of the minivan made contact with the rear driver side of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The minivan sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.